It is not only ship charterers that will default on shipping trusts.
Back in the hey day when Pacific shipping trust, First Ship Lease Trust and Rickmers Maritime was suffering when their ship charterers was defaulting on the ships owned by them, the prevalent message was don’t buy ships but stick to real estate trust. Or even worse, don’t buy business trust, only buy real estate investment trust (REIT).
I would like to think of it in another way: there will come a time when property in Singapore is in a rut, and then you will perhaps see the same kind of incidents happening.
We don’t have to wait long to see a REIT looking as bad as the shipping trusts during some of their worse days. Sabana was the first one to show signs that if the management is not up to it, in a challenging segment, the share price and dividend performance will exhibit the same downward trend.
The land lease of the building is short at 23 years, but I reckon the management did their financial due diligence and think this is a good deal. In our finance speak, that means a good internal rate of return (IRR)
I asked the investor relations whether the short land lease is a concern. Here is the reply:
Based on the annual rental (and embedded rental escalations) agreed with the vendor, our investment team ran a full rental cashflow for the remaining 23 years of the lease and the resulting property yield and internal rate of return (IRR) are in line with SoilbuildREIT’s investment criteria.
As such, we feel that the final purchase price for the property is justified.
There is nothing wrong with this thesis.
I came to this conclusion that as long as the financial figures are done with good knowledge of historical and future scenarios and conservatively estimated, if the IRR is good they should go for it. Short land lease would mean they need to do more work in the future to replenish the cash flow of the REIT.
Its just that not many think that a “charterer” would default on their charter.
This evening Soilbuild Business Trust announced the following:
Soilbuild Business is attempting to claim SG$2 mil in rent, an SG$11.8 mil in security deposit for the second year of rent, and any interest owed during the period where they did not pay the rent.
This may be a bit long drawn but it would classify as a distressed situation.
We learnt this from FSL Trust’s case studies. The IRR figures are not wrong. Its just that you have not considered the counterparty risk.
And we raised that Soilbuild have a large composition exposed to the distressed oil and gas sector.
This is something I worried for charters such as my position in Singapore Shipping Corporation where their ships are chartered to “blue chip charterers” for 10 to 15 years.
Those deals are splendid. It is a long tenant that pays you consistent cash flow for the majority of the lifespan of the asset, with little variability in expenses. You can then structure cheap financing to match this duration and you can compute your rate of return easily.
This thesis breaks down when the tenant defaults on you. No matter how long the lease with how good an annual escalation, if the counterparty defaults, you have a problem.
One of Cache Logistics’ recent Australia purchase is as such.Very long lease with great escalation to Metcash Trading, which is posting some loss numbers and are struggling.
It is not only ships that will be in a rut. Every assets will have their time.
Though I reckon in the worst case scenario it may be easier for Soilbuild Business to rent out the premises to another tenant at a lower rent, rather than leave it empty.
Update: This evening there are more news on Technics Oil and Gas contract void and 2 parties submitting write of summons to TOG