Kyith is the Owner and Sole Writer behind Investment Moats. Readers tune in to Investment Moats to learn and build stronger, firmer wealth foundations, how to have a Passive investment strategy, know more about investing in REITs and the nuts and bolts of Active Investing.
Readers also follow Kyith to learn how to plan well for Financial Security and Financial Independence.
Kyith worked as an IT operations engineer from 2004 to 2019. Currently, he works as a Senior Solutions Specialist in Fee-only Wealth Advisory firm Providend.
You can view Kyith's current portfolio here, which uses his Free Google Stock Portfolio Tracker.
His investment broker of choice is Interactive Brokers, which allows him to invest in securities from different exchanges all over the world, at very low commission rates, without custodian fees, near spot currency rates.
You can read more about Kyith here.
Tina
Wednesday 13th of April 2011
If your age is not old (say 30) you can leverage using $1 for $1000. You use $5000 to pay for a $500,000 coverage. In 20yrs you paid a $100k. Critical illness (just like death) is almost a sureness, if you decide to take out the $100k and stop the leverage, it's ok. You also have the choice to continue leaving your $100k there and leverage with bonuses upon a claim on critical illness or death or total permanent disability, no further input of cash is needed. I think it is a workable strategy for our health do not improve as we age, it deteriorates...insurer may not want us or the risk is too high the insurer will just charge us high premiums. However, rule of thumb is to justify your cover amount needed before you find the most efficient way on how you pay for it, either pure term, term+whole life or whole life limited pay. It's all up to you.
Drizzt
Wednesday 13th of April 2011
Hi Tina, thanks for visiting. I think its an interesting thought that you will definitely succumbed to cancer so you should make sure you get the most bang for the buck.
I never thought of it that way. most do not really!