Here is IFA Wilfred Ling’s take on why term insurance was banned in one insurance Agency >> Ban for Selling Term
About Kyith
Founder & Sole Employee of InvestmentMoats.com . Senior Solutions Specialist at Fee-Only Advisory Firm Providend by day. Blogger by night. Active Stock Investor for 15 years. SG & HK Mkts. Pursues Financial Security & Financial Independence. Reached Financial Independence at 38. Facebook , Twitter. More on Kyith ...
Comments
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
If your age is not old (say 30) you can leverage using $1 for $1000. You use $5000 to pay for a $500,000 coverage. In 20yrs you paid a $100k. Critical illness (just like death) is almost a sureness, if you decide to take out the $100k and stop the leverage, it’s ok. You also have the choice to continue leaving your $100k there and leverage with bonuses upon a claim on critical illness or death or total permanent disability, no further input of cash is needed. I think it is a workable strategy for our health do not improve as we age, it deteriorates…insurer may not want us or the risk is too high the insurer will just charge us high premiums. However, rule of thumb is to justify your cover amount needed before you find the most efficient way on how you pay for it, either pure term, term+whole life or whole life limited pay. It’s all up to you.
Hi Tina, thanks for visiting. I think its an interesting thought that you will definitely succumbed to cancer so you should make sure you get the most bang for the buck.
I never thought of it that way. most do not really!