There is this deep, personal finance topic that a lot of every day people are trying to figure out that perhaps some financial bloggers do not know.
And once they know it they will spam the financial blogosphere with article.
The topic: should I pay off my HDB loan early?
It didn’t occur to me that this was a big topic until I was asked quite a fair bit by people I first met. Not the ridiculous what Miles versus Cash back competition. It is like asking which fragrance you prefer for the mothballs you put into your toilet bowl.
Then you realize they all earn from any of the mothballs that you buy. If you really want to know, I don’t put mothballs in my toilet bowl (and don’t think you wanna come to my home now that you know this.)
I think why a lot of friends and family is exploring this question is because I think most of us are conservative and want to do the right thing by accelerating pay off.
However, we want to do the right thing and am not sure if paying off the home loans early is a wise choice.
I wrote an article exploring whether we should repay more of our 2.6% HDB loan to save 0.1%.
This was a tough comparison, and there were a lot of people giving feedback on Facebook with my results. The general idea is that if you delay your HDB loan payback, the money in OA can have a longer time to compound and so eventually it wins out, versus if you pay back early.
However, the conclusion is a bit mixed but somewhat the conclusion is more about not paying back so fast.
I think the opportunity cost is even larger if you choose to transfer the money from your CPF OA to your CPF SA.
So we should end our discussion there.
Except that I think we can find a better balance between paying off your mortgage loan early, versus taking advantage of that mortgage loan.
You see there are advantage of paying off loans early:
- You become unencumbered. If you do not have debts, your company have less of a hold over you to continue to slave for them (you could also switch companies if you are good enough)
- If you wish to purchase another investment property, you can take a larger loan, pay a smaller down payment if you are unencumbered (due to Singapore’s property ruling)
There are also advantages if you do not pay off early.
Well there is one main reason.
The property loan is a unique loan that is secured against a property and therefore the interest rate is relatively low. Thus, it is a cheap form of financing. As long as you are able to service it, it is less likely the banks can margin call this loan.
As such, if you can leverage upon this loan, it can be financially very beneficial to you.
At one end of the spectrum, it is suitable for greedy people. At one end it is suitable for very risk adverse people.
The answer that you are looking for is perhaps somewhere in the middle.
If you are a wealth builder, I think it makes sense to drag out the loan.
Suppose you are a stock investor, you can borrow to leverage up your stock position. You may wish to buy a blue chip REIT Ascendas REIT on leverage.
However, the interest financing option is not cheap. It ranges from 3.3% to 6% depending on the kind of stocks you wish to purchase.
If you are able to buy, you are at the mercy of the brokerage because they can be very very fickle when times are bad.
Stocks are also inherently volatile.
If you combine a volatile brokerage and stocks, and it becomes a problematic form of finance.
Frame Delaying Early Mortgage Payoff as a Line of Credit
You could frame not paying off your mortgage early as getting a line of lower interest credit.
If you pay off your mortgage early, that cash flow gets locked into the property, and you cannot do anything with it. Unless you sell the property.
Now, I am aware that if you own a private property, you could possibly re-mortgage or get a line of credit secured against your property. However, with HDB loan, you cannot do that.
There is an opportunity cost to early pay off.
By not early paying off, you could take that cash flow which otherwise you would pay off to go out and enjoy, or to build wealth. The latter is the more sensible option.
You could take that cash flow and purchase some savings plans, build an exchange traded fund portfolio or purchase some dividend or growth stocks.
Try your best to move towards a Less than 100% Personal Debt to Liquid Asset Ratio
With a mortgage out there, how do you gauge whether you are in a safe position or not in a safe position?
I will recommend we work on a basic concept: You can borrow money, but if the situation becomes challenging, you should be able to “cover back” the debt as quickly as possible.
I think if you work hard to reach a less than 100% personal debt to liquid asset ratio, you should be OK.
What are liquid assets?
These would be cash & equivalents, financial assets that you could liquidate easily for cash, whether you lose money or not.
For example you can have a portfolio of stocks. Some of them could lose value, but you could sell them readily and convert them to cash.
The table above shows the possible asset and liability situation of you.
You will have a total asset base of $800,000. You still have $300,000 in outstanding mortgage debt. Based on your debt to total asset ratio of 37.5% which looks pretty good.
However, if you lose your job, if all your assets are not liquid, and cannot be en-cashed easily, you will face some issue meeting the mortgage payment.
If we only consider the assets that are liquid and compare them against your total debt, then it might be more meaningful.
In this case, your cash, portfolio and savings plans are liquid. Some are more liquid then the others. For example, you might choose to liquidate the portfolio than the savings plans since the savings plan might not have reached maturity.
In theory, you should have $400,000 in liquid assets. If we divide the total debt of $300,000 by the total liquid assets of $400,000, we have a debt to liquid assets ratio of 75%.
This means for $1 of liquid assets, you only have $0.75 in debt.
In this way, you take advantage of the cheaper financing to grow your asset base. In the worst case scenario, you could liquidate part or all your liquid assets to pay off the mortgage.
This is also one of the ways we ascertain how safe a stock is. If the stock could pay off its debt with its liquid assets, then it can weather financial storms much better.
You worry less whether you should pay off your debt early or invest.
As long as you build up productive assets, this improves your overall net worth, and also put the money in productive sources.
You start off in a position where your total debt to liquid assets might be above 100% but if you wish to be product, work your way to less than 100% debt to liquid assets.
The Last Word
I said in the past, in real situations, you do not need to ensure you have cash to cover your entire mortgage.
If you have liquid assets that covers 3 to 4 years of your debt, it is pretty good.
However, a lot of us would like to compartmentalize and think that we are debt free in a certain way. Keeping a debt to liquid assets of less than 100% is a way to achieve this.
Also do be aware that, while the interest rate is relatively low for home loans, if you decide to build liquid assets and keep them in cash, perhaps it makes more sense to pay off the mortgage.
Do Like Me on Facebook. I share some tidbits that is not on the blog post there often.
Here are My Topical Resources on:
- Building Your Wealth Foundation – You know this baseline, your long term wealth should be pretty well managed
- Active Investing – For the active stock investors. My deeper thoughts from my stock investing experience
- Learning about REITs – My Free “Course” on REIT Investing for Beginners and Seasoned Investors
- Dividend Stock Tracker – Track all the common 4-10% yielding dividend stocks in SG
- Free Stock Portfolio Tracking Google Sheets that many love
- Retirement Planning, Financial Independence and Spending down money – My deep dive into how much you need to achieve these, and the different ways you can be financially free