The role of an investor prospecting businesses is to always be educated how differently they can look at a business and what they can gather from the data provided.
One of the main problems that I used to have is to assess the level of capital expenditure of a business and how to make sense of whether:
- what is the nature of this business in terms of their capital expenditure needs
- more capital expenditure is good
- less capital expenditure is good
- how do we present capital expenditure to ourselves and peers so that it reduces the overhead in interpretation
- what should it correlate with? revenue, free cash flow or profit?
Professor Damodaran has a good piece recently in his series to profile a few car based trajectories like Uber, Lyft.
In this piece, it is the possible upcoming IPO of Ferrari.
If I can take away one or two things each from these articles and they are rather impactful metrics, then this article is probably worth $2000 at least to purchase in my opinion.
I find these two metrics paints us stories that helps in our appreciation of the business.
There are different ways to look at capital expenditure and one problem is you won’t know whether it is a maintenance capital expenditure or an investment of future growth. The easy way out is ask the management and hope they tell you.
If you are in early stage of research, you want to draw some questions for you to further explore, this capex ex depreciation to sales does help.
Assets in business depreciate and needs to be replaced.
In a lot of cases you need more investments to increase revenue.
The best businesses perhaps needs less investments when revenue increase. The best business may require less to maintain.
Hence this ratio over historical gives us a story.
In his baseline valuation of Ferrari, he ascertains based on qualitative and past data the conservative and realistic growth rate of the revenue. Almost everything ties to the revenue, and with that you can come up with a discounted cash flow value for the company.
Of note here is the assumption that Sales / Invested Capital stays at 1.42.
How do we know that sales to invested capital stays constant? Past historical data. Relate that to the qualitative story of why sales are better that year or why sales are worse.
A constant Sales to Invested Capital shows efficient operation, and perhaps the nature of the business that you have to invest more capital as more business comes in.
A growing sales to invested capital shows a business that needs LESS capital as revenue increases. Perhaps there are economic moat in the business.
A falling sales to invested capital shows a business that perhaps under more competition requires more resources, or that it is in a stage where more invested capital is needed before tapering off
These two ratios help you form a story of a company you do not know so well. It probably shows whether there are hidden economic moats.
You still have to confirm the story. The quantitative data here tells you perhaps there is a story, but how true is the story? You got to look into similar competitors to see if you see the same trends in their competitors.
If they don’t, this is either a fraud or some damn good operator.
More stories and more things to look into.