What a difference between 2 papers. Can you tell which one is a Singapore news paper and which one is not a Singapore newpaper!
Kyith is the Owner and Sole Writer behind Investment Moats. Readers tune in to Investment Moats to learn and build stronger, firmer wealth foundations, how to have a Passive investment strategy, know more about investing in REITs and the nuts and bolts of Active Investing.
Readers also follow Kyith to learn how to plan well for Financial Security and Financial Independence.
Kyith worked as an IT operations engineer from 2004 to 2019. Currently, he works as a Senior Solutions Specialist in Insurance Start-up Havend. All opinions on Investment Moats are his own and does not represent the views of Providend.
You can view Kyith's current portfolio here, which uses his Free Google Stock Portfolio Tracker.
His investment broker of choice is Interactive Brokers, which allows him to invest in securities from different exchanges all over the world, at very low commission rates, without custodian fees, near spot currency rates.
You can read more about Kyith here.
- Enlightening Thoughts from Venture Capitalist’s Resignation Letter. - September 16, 2024
- How to Create Nice Separation of Your Investments in One Interactive Brokers Account. - September 15, 2024
- Jonathan Clements Unique Way of Dying. - September 12, 2024
Bulldog
Monday 18th of February 2013
Actually, the father did bad things too. Just that most of us profited from it by good economic growth, jobs and profits from investments. Hence, we choose to turn a blind eye. At least we can honestly say we don't know. Better than being a supporter or accomplice.
Likewise, some of us are voting this way. We knowingly turn a blind eye, or just give moral support because it benefits us, not because it is the morally right thing to do.
James
Monday 18th of February 2013
Profiting from the current mistakes made by PAP will increase the pain that the future generations have the suffer - High property prices, poor public transportation, inorganic (artificial) GDP growth. It's really ridiculous how the top PAP leaders endorse a policy that will result in Singaporeans making up only half the population by 2030, and they can still sell the 'strong Singaporean core' ideology.
The father built Singapore, and the son destroys it.
Cindy
Monday 18th of February 2013
And what about that very significant piece in the Financial Times last week: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/afbddb44-7640-11e2-8eb6-00144feabdc0.html
Has anyone seen any coverage of that story in the local press???
Mary
Sunday 17th of February 2013
I voted for PAP in the past few elections. Not because I thought PAP was doing a good job. Actually, I am aware of their mismanagement. But I now have vested interests to keep things the way they are. Basically, I am voting in for a bad party because I found a way to profit from their mistakes.
And I suspect many who voted for PAP are also doing the same, or because they vote in memory for the PAP leaders of 1965 - 1990. I seriously doubt they are voting for because of the current ability and accomplishment of the current leaders, including recently retired leaders like Mah Bow Tan.
Drizzt
Sunday 17th of February 2013
There comes a time that you have to put something more intangible before what is tangible.
James
Sunday 17th of February 2013
The White Paper protest definitely deserved a front-page appearance. There wasn't even a small feature article about it at the top row. This definitely confirms the pro-PAP bias of SPH media.