Investment Moats

  • Home
  • High Yield Dividend Stocks
  • My Current Portfolio
  • About
    • Advertise / Hire Me
  • My Resources
    • Build Wealth Foundation
    • Active Investing
    • REITs Investing
    • Redesigning Your Life
    • Retirement Planning
  • FREE Calculators
    • Dividend Stock Tracker
    • Stock Portfolio Tracker
    • Cost of Car Ownership Online Calculator
    • Wealthy Calculator
    • Property Investment Calculator

A Strategy to Avoid The Pain of Losses? Don’t Be Naive

November 13, 2019 by Kyith 8 Comments

When Eagle Hospitality Trust’s (EHT) share price fell recently, I thought it is a rather good exercise to take a look at how 5 investors will experience the downside.

EHT is a real estate investment trust (REIT) who master leased their assets to their sponsors.

At various price points, it provides the investor with a dividend yield of 8% to 14%, based on their forecasted cash flow guidelines.

When the share price fell, many investors sell. There are also investors who think there is a value somewhere and are buying.

This is, after all, a business model that is not very unfamiliar to many people. It looks like it is fixable in the long term. At the same time, there is uncertainty because it feels like the current true value of the hotels are much less than what was stated in the IPO.

The Experiences of 5 Investors

Suppose we have 5 investors that tried and successfully gotten invested in EHT at different times.

All 5 investors have the same mentality:

  1. They think that at the price they buy, there is value. While the time period they are looking at is different, they believe that given the time frame they are looking at, the total return (dividend income received + capital appreciation) will outweigh the prices they are paying now.
  2. They all don’t like to lose money. The feeling of seeing their capital in the red kills them.
  3. If given the choice they want to protect their downside
  4. They all want to get in at the price where it is the lowest

So the price chart of EHT for the past 3 months plus look like this:

The price could go three ways:

  1. Up
  2. Down
  3. Sideways

Depend on the timeframe.

Which Investors Feel the Least Pain?

When we

  1. Sell and buy back at a lower price
  2. Wait to buy at a lower price
  3. Take profit and then try to buy back lower (almost similar to #1)
  4. Buy only after a certain plunge

Behavioral wise, we are trying to minimize the pain.

So how did this work out for our investors?

The table shows our 5 investors, who sought to buy at the closest value point, where they will be able to maximize their profits, minimize their downside:

The percentage of losses at different price points

Suppose time suspended today and we take stock of the performance.

At this point, investors 1 to 4 all have unrealized losses:

  • Investor 1 lost 35.4%
  • Investor 2 lost 31.6%
  • Investor 3 lost 29%
  • Investor 4 lost 17%

Investor 5 has the best timing and managed to get out a 5.7% return.

Who was the Smart One?

Investor 3 thought he got a good deal.

Looking at the price chart, he got in at $0.655 instead of the high of $0.68.

Investor 2 would argue she got a good deal. Instead of getting it close to IPO at $0.72 she got it at $0.68.

If we were to use some hindsight bias, and we review this way, Investor 4 got the best deal out of those that currently lost money. She got in at not $0.72, not $0.68, not $0.655 but a much, much lower $0.56.

At this point, the smartest is, of course, Investor 5 who managed to end up with a profit.

In the end, the 3 investors after the first one didn’t avoid downside. They still suffered losses.

The Impact may be Different If We Consider the Potential Absolute Losses

What spook most of us with losses is that:

  1. We think we are making the biggest mistake of our lives
  2. We think we are losing a large part of our net worth and that is irrecoverable

In terms of percentage, the impact might not be as big. But what if we present it in terms of absolute dollars?

Imagine that Investor 1 to 5 invested $100,000.

Investors 1 to 3 have potential losses of nearly $30,000 while Investor 4 has potential losses of $17,000.

To some of you losing $30,000 is a very, very, very big deal and something very distressing. For some of you, this is nothing much.

What if We Layer in Net Worth and Time Horizon?

Suppose I tell you that Investor 1’s net worth is $2 million.

Do you think if you are Investor 1, you can endure an unrealized loss of $-35,417?

I think Investor 1 had an easier time than Investor 3 if we know Investor 3’s net worth is $120,000. With a $-29,000 loss, she almost lost 24% of her net worth.

But Investor 3 will feel less pain if we know that her salary is $80,000 a year and she has 20 years more to retirement.

While this potential loss is large if she can critically think, her savings from her salary over the next 20 years will more than offset this $29,000 of potential loss.

You Need to Learn to Live with Psychological Stress of Being in the Market

We all wish to avoid feeling the pain of seeing our hard earn and previous money vanish in thin air.

But if we use price as the sole indicator in our investment decision making, you might not avoid that painful feeling of seeing your portfolio in a losing position.

In this EHT example, 4 out of the 5 investors suffered the psychological stress of seeing their portfolio in a big losing position.

There is this strategy being passed around that you should only invest in a great bear market. One where the market went down at least 30%.

It is likely they wish to

  1. avoid losing money
  2. looking like a vegetable head
  3. suffering losses to their psychological capital

The math of things tell me that you can’t avoid the pain of seeing large unrealized losses in your portfolio.

You cannot avoid the pain:

  1. For those picking the bottom, only a handful would manage to do that. And they do so by luck most of the time
  2. For those buying at the bottom, if you see a stock go down from $1.00 to $0.30 and you buy it, don’t feel surprise seeing it go down to $0.15. You avoid a 70% potential loss, only to get into a 50% potential loss.

What is the solution?

Based on what I understand being in the markets this 15 years, there is not much strategy that can make you avoid the pain and still earn a great return.

It means… you need to increase your willingness to take risk by learning to endure this psychological stress.

Long term, you are likely to earn good returns.

The cost is that you need to pay for this by enduring psychological stress.

This is Your Pact with the Devil.

Being a historian of the markets, being a connoisseur of understand behavioral finance can help you cope with the pain of unrealized losses better. It may enable you to retain as much psychological capital as possible.

Lastly, in financial planning, we talk about your ability to take risks. Many pay lip service to it until they take psychological damage from the markets and see their psychological capital depleting at a much faster pace than their financial capital.

I have shown you that your position sizing, relative to your net worth, to your income and how far you are from your wealth accumulation goal, affects how much psychological damage that you may take.

If you are near your goal, your income is going to stop soon, your ability to take risk is much, much lower even though your willingness to take risk is high. If you lose a large part of your capital, it will be very hard to earn them back.

However, if you have a long time horizon, even though you have lost a significant part of your net worth this time around, you learn from this possible mistake. In the next 15 years, you would replenish your capital through savings and if the stock recovers.

Here is a summary of making pain more livable:

  1. Understand Your Investment Strategy – It has to be both Fundamentally Sound and Implementable/Applicable to You
  2. Not evaluate based on price but based on understanding the business and whether you have a margin of safety in your investment
  3. Understand your ability to take risk. This is dependent on your time horizon – how far are you from your wealth accumulation goal
  4. Size each position carefully based on
    1. Your Net Wealth
    2. Your Percentage Savings Rate of your Net Salary from Work
  5. Be a historian of the markets, being a connoisseur of understand behavioral finance can help you cope with the pain of unrealized losses better

If you like content like this, I write more of this in my Active Investing section below:

Do Like Me on Facebook. I share some tidbits that is not on the blog post there often. You can also choose to subscribe to my content via email below.

I break down my resources according to these topics:

  1. Building Your Wealth Foundation – If you know and apply these simple financial concepts, your long term wealth should be pretty well managed. Find out what they are
  2. Active Investing – For the active stock investors. My deeper thoughts from my stock investing experience
  3. Learning about REITs – My Free “Course” on REIT Investing for Beginners and Seasoned Investors
  4. Dividend Stock Tracker – Track all the common 4-10% yielding dividend stocks in SG
  5. Free Stock Portfolio Tracking Google Sheets that many love
  6. Retirement Planning, Financial Independence and Spending down money – My deep dive into how much you need to achieve these, and the different ways you can be financially free
  7. Providend – Where I work doing research. Fee-Only Advisory. No Commissions. Financial Independence Advisers and Retirement Specialists. No charge for first meeting to understand how it works

Filed Under: Wealth Building

Thoughts on the HENRYs, Forgetting FIRE and the Appeal of Annuities

November 10, 2019 by Kyith 4 Comments

I still have some work to do over the weekends so its no stock analysis, less reading, all work.

Meantime, I came across some stuff that you might find interesting. Something on FIRE, something on media coverage, a little on the HENRYs and my thoughts on annuities.

My Thoughts on Annuities

In my last Sunday article, I profiled how an insurance adviser manages the potentially volatile nature of his income.

He has a question for me that I forgot to address and so I do owe him an answer.

Basically, what do I think about annuities?

It is a weird question but this question can be about what I think about it as a wealth accumulation tool and what I think about it as part of retirement spending. I think my friend is more interested in my opinion about it as a retirement tool.

As an accumulation tool, annuities are likely to be underpowered. They should return you 2.5% a year to 4% a year. If you take on leverage, you would boost your IRR to above 4%.

You do take on more risk when you take on leverage. Interest rate movement can be 50% up and down within a short time.

As a retirement spending tool, they look appealing. Guaranteed income + non-guaranteed income. Those that are close to being retired like them a lot because they promised passive income payouts.

As I have explained in this Providend Passive Income article, what matters is the total return when we are in the accumulation phase and it is as important in the de-accumulation phase.

When a person buys an annuity, it is a vote that

  1. I wish to have passive income
  2. I am not good at having a systematic way of varying my spending up and down. I prefer for someone to tell me how much to spend on

The greatest benefit to those retiring is that they transferred the investment to the insurance company. They have also transferred the cash flow management to the insurance company.

There is a cost to this. The cost to this should be lower returns.

If this is the case, it makes these cash value endowments and whole life to be poorer wealth accumulation tools. But if you are really bad with money, you can consider getting them. But at the end of the day, you cannot run away from some financial planning problems such as how much can I safely spend.

If you have 10 streams of income, and you do not know how to spend without exhausting your capital, having 10 streams of income is less useful.

Another drawback is… I think the payouts are not inflation adjusting. Thus annuities can be used to address your core/survival expenses. But they cannot take care of the inflation adjustment of your core/survival expenses.

Start Your Financial Planning at 40 and Forget about F.I.R.E

Alvin Teo wrote this pretty popular article over at the Astute Parent. The basic premise is that life is pretty volatile before the age of 40.

The advice is that realistically, you can only start planning your retirement after 40.

FIRE is difficult because

  1. You need a high income
  2. You need low expenses. But this is difficult to achieve
    1. Cars are a necessity and expensive

Alvin is a financial planner so what he said should hold some weight.

The 25 to 40 period is said to be the most volatile because you are in your career building phase. Your income has not reached a level where your family feels comfortable with. You have 2 young children and logistically you will need a car.

I think it is not because your cash flow is volatile.

The right word will be that your expenses keep climbing and you could not have a high savings rate. A high savings rate is a very, very important part of accumulating money fast for financial independence or other goals.

So he is not too wrong there.

But I got some push back.

No one said that if you do not retire by 40-year-old, you are severely missing out.

It seems that his brain is fixated on this 40-year anchor or someone imprinted that in his head.

Alvin cited Pete Adeney as one of the pioneers in this movement. One reason that he could reach his magical number at age 30 is because they are working in software engineering. They earn a good salary and thus they have a leg up.

If you read through Pete’s route to accumulating his US$600,000, you will realize that while he earns above average, relatively speaking, it is not out of this world kind of salary.

His first salary is US$41,000 a year. I am not sure if this is out of this world high. It probably was higher than average in 1997. In today’s dollars, this is US$71,000 a year.

What was a success for them was:

  1. Their magical number is measurably smaller
  2. They control their spending
  3. They control their family dynamics
  4. They well optimized their slightly above middle-income salary

Having a high salary helps speed up accumulation and improves planning a lot but overly focus on the high income dissuades people who fit these criteria from achieving something that is useful.

The 40s and 50s Can be More Volatile

So here is more likely his plan. Manage your expenses before 40 by getting your home infrastructure in place. This means get married, renovate your home, budget for both your children, pay off your mortgage.

By the start of your 40s, you should have a much more comfortable financial situation:

  1. should understand your family budget better
  2. have less big-ticket / lump sum expenses that you would need to pay for
  3. if you have done correctly, you may have de-leverage your home mortgage loan

The problem that we may face is that the 40s and 50s may not be less volatile.

We can roughly map the milestones

  1. 30s: Child-bearing, wedding, buy-house
  2. 40s – 50s: Kids tuition, Children tertiary education, taking care of parents
  3. 60s: Retirement spending

Many of us feel the expenses never go down. It just keeps going up. And so the salary would have to keep up.

An emerging problem is that the 40s and 50s is just as challenging

  1. Mid-life crisis & depression
  2. Your job hits terminal salary growth faster than you imagine
  3. Retrenchment and having to re-climb the ladder again
  4. Taking care of parents, losing your parents

Now, imagine being middle income and having limited resources, facing the above. Not less volatile isn’t it.

In fact, you may not be more employable.

We end up funding our lifestyle to just be in time for when our salary is more volatile. (Unless you believe the old corporate ladder system still existing)

The point is that 40s and 50s are not less challenging than the 20s and 30s.

Everyone’s Situation is Different

When you write for the masses, you have to use a very average person as an example. However, there are some of you who would really do better doing what Pete Adeney did.

Your spouse and yourself earn $160,000 a year that in 5 years you could amass $500,000. A $500,000 wealth at age 33 would be able to grow on its own over time if it is deployed well. You worry less about uncertain future career in the 40s and 50s by pre-funding it now.

And since you could maintain a frugal nature, it is likely your family can use 1 year of savings for wedding, renovation, and furnishing.

Funding goals need not be spreading your money out evenly over time.

You can choose not to fund retirement first. First-year save up $92,000. That is equivalent to your 2 children’s local degree in today’s dollars. You could put this $92,000 in a balanced portfolio and let it grow over time.

Then next year, commit that $92,000 to something else.

Higher than average salary, with knowledge, plus intentional living is what pursuing Financial independence is really about.

You can choose not to pursue it and go with a traditional route. But some of you would have missed out on some great life opportunity costs.

The Surprising Part of the Eagle Hospitality Trust Coverage

Recently, in the financial space, what is on people’s minds is the Eagle Hospitality Trust saga. A seemingly not very popular REIT became one of the most scrutinized REIT in a few short weeks.

Enough bloggers write about it because we crave for eyeballs and ad dollars but also… because perhaps this is a genuinely good buying opportunity.

When a stock goes down with poor news, either they have long term fixable issues, or that there is a change in fundamentals. The former would mean this is a good buying opportunity, and we might want to stay away if it is the latter.

However, I would like to comment on a certain aspect of this EHT narrative.

We realized that established news sources such as SPH have deeply researched company pieces. The same journalist who wrote a deeply investigative piece about Best World also wrote about Eagle Hospitality Trust.

Deep scuttlebutt is not something that journalist cannot do. Even the average joe can do it if they put their minds and deductive minds to it. I have seen conscientious average retail investors try their best to do it. If you are willing to dig, you are able to find things.

I do think that if you write as a job, there are just so many things to do. So much so that I wonder if someone is providing journalists with areas to look into. I grew to empathize with analysts when people say some of their reports do not value add. I want to see you put your heart and soul into writing when you have to cover so many companies.

Would the people providing these sources have some agendas?

Let us pay attention to whether there are deeply researched articles without the crisis elements in SPH Business Times next time.

The HENRYS – Huge Opportunities that can be Lost Easily

HENRY is short for High Earners Not Rich Yet.

There is this site called HNWORTH with a rather well-researched article on it. I appreciate him trying to do the research work.

This is a group that is likely earning between $250,000 to $500,000 a year. It is probably the dream of all financial advisers to make up the majority of their client base with clients of this stature.

The take-away that I get from the article is that the gap between this group and those above them, versus the rest are getting wider. Their income and wealth are growing versus other groups which are struggling.

Not just that, the data seem to give me an impression that

  1. deposits and cash have growth a lot
  2. private property have grown a lot
  3. CPF has grown a lot

The rest have not grown as fast.

There seemed to be a pent up demand for private properties, as if, there is not enough residential private properties around for investments.

I have sort of form this view about a segment such as this. The typical higher decile Singaporean household would spend between $4000 a month to $9000 a month. Those on the high side would spend between $7000 a month to $12,000 a month. This depends on how frugal or spendthrift they are.

What this means is that it is likely they will have a high savings rate (about 40-70%), to channel into saving and investments. So there is much pent up money waiting to be invested.

The main instrument would be private properties. With the ABSD, psychologically this might deter some of them from buying another one. Other good investments for the HENRYs would be what is provided by the private bankers.

The HENRYs are in a position where a lot of people wishes to manage their money and eventually, they might end up with an assortment of financial assets that they forget the initial reasons for buying them (if there is any)

They have great opportunities, but they may easily lose all these opportunities as well if they are not careful.

Do Like Me on Facebook. I share some tidbits that is not on the blog post there often. You can also choose to subscribe to my content via email below.

I break down my resources according to these topics:

  1. Building Your Wealth Foundation – If you know and apply these simple financial concepts, your long term wealth should be pretty well managed. Find out what they are
  2. Active Investing – For the active stock investors. My deeper thoughts from my stock investing experience
  3. Learning about REITs – My Free “Course” on REIT Investing for Beginners and Seasoned Investors
  4. Dividend Stock Tracker – Track all the common 4-10% yielding dividend stocks in SG
  5. Free Stock Portfolio Tracking Google Sheets that many love
  6. Retirement Planning, Financial Independence and Spending down money – My deep dive into how much you need to achieve these, and the different ways you can be financially free
  7. Providend – Where I work doing research. Fee-Only Advisory. No Commissions. Financial Independence Advisers and Retirement Specialists. No charge for first meeting to understand how it works

Filed Under: Money

When Europe, Singapore, and Value Smashed the United States and Growth

November 7, 2019 by Kyith 3 Comments

The last time all these value factors didn’t work so well, for such a long time is in the 1920s.

That is a long time.

Our brains would probably reason that there are similarities today to the time back then. When there are periods of extreme financial upheavals, the value factor does not seem to work so well. (When we say extreme it is this kind of financial meltdown, not your typical 20-30% market drawdowns)

Looking back, the value factors came back. As an investor having a 30 years horizon, you would have enough time to benefit from it.

There is also another dislocation.

The investors living through these past 10 years will form the opinion that the only place to be is in United States stocks. And they are not wrong.

Their experience with the market is that U.S Stocks Trounced all others (that is not true. There are more obscure markets that did better).

Albert Bridge Capital did some data crunching and present some insightful data.

They are based in Europe and thus, they are more concerned about the market performance in Europe versus other markets.

For 3 decades, the performance of MSCI Europe has matched the S&P 500. Europe did better in the first and third decade. United States better in the second.

If you are a wealth builder, I would say that if you have $50,000 on 31st Dec 1979, and you add $3,000 a year for the past 30 years, you would have amassed $652,528 at the end of this 30 years.

But after 2009, everything changed.

We can observe the difference in the last decade. United States did better.

My friend Mr 15 Hour Work Week said something along the lines that Europe and Hong Kong is Trash. I guess it is ridiculous to invest in them.

Sometimes I do not know.

Most folks expect that if these markets are so visibly poor, then it should mean they perform very poorly. Most folks are also heavily influenced by what is happening recently.

They have this idea that these correlations between asset classes, geographical markets that they just experienced will stay consistent throughout.

It is only older farts like ourselves that see the period where the United States were doing not too badly yet the markets were not performing well (refer to the second decade in the chart above)

My Judgement was Also Clouded

We recently have to help one of our advisers do up a growth of wealth comparison. Basically, we want to compare how much $1 invested in different indexes will be at the end of a certain time period.

In SGD.

Both my solutions head and myself have this mindset that the S&P 500 will do the best.

Growth of Wealth of 1 from 2010 to 2019 today for S&P 500, Dimensional World Equity Index, MSCI All Country and MSCI Singapore

We were not wrong.

From 2010 to 2019 1 or 2 months ago there was this tremendous outperformance. And for those who are saying Singapore market is shit, you are not wrong as well.

I choose to see that for our Providend clients who invested in the Dimensional World Equity Fund, their money would double in Singapore dollars.

But let us factor in 10 years before, from 1999 to 2019, and see how is the result:

Growth of Wealth of 1 from 1999 to 2019 today for S&P 500, Dimensional World Equity Index, MSCI All Country and MSCI Singapore

The MSCI Singapore and DFA World Equity Index proxy in SGD, absolutely killed the S&P 500.

My boss and I originally think this is because of the strong SGD. We shifted it back to USD. Still the same. It is not a currency thing.

Nothing is Set in Stone

Will Europe or Value factors go back to “the balance”?

I am not sure. I guess that is my posture in all this. I am currently an individual stock investor. As an individual stock investor, whether which market outperform or underperform, you can have a game plan to do relatively well.

If you are not good, you get smashed pretty badly.

If you are a passive wealth builder, this might matter to you more.

And my answer to this is, I do not know.

If you lean towards an opinion that despite what Kyith presented, I still think there is no way the United States and growth would do worse than any other markets than you should invest that way.

But if you are of the opinion that I do not know whether THIS TIME IT IS REALLY DIFFERENT, the better way is to hold a moderate portfolio that gives you exposure to all and let the market tell you.

This can be an MSCI World ETF, a low-cost global equity unit trust like the Dimensional World Equity or Dimensional Global Core fund and a global bond fund.

The takeaway I get from this is… man… we have really short term memory of things. But also the future is unknown. “the balance” in the past might not be “the balance” after factoring the future.

Do Like Me on Facebook. I share some tidbits that is not on the blog post there often. You can also choose to subscribe to my content via email below.

I break down my resources according to these topics:

  1. Building Your Wealth Foundation – If you know and apply these simple financial concepts, your long term wealth should be pretty well managed. Find out what they are
  2. Active Investing – For the active stock investors. My deeper thoughts from my stock investing experience
  3. Learning about REITs – My Free “Course” on REIT Investing for Beginners and Seasoned Investors
  4. Dividend Stock Tracker – Track all the common 4-10% yielding dividend stocks in SG
  5. Free Stock Portfolio Tracking Google Sheets that many love
  6. Retirement Planning, Financial Independence and Spending down money – My deep dive into how much you need to achieve these, and the different ways you can be financially free
  7. Providend – Where I work doing research. Fee-Only Advisory. No Commissions. Financial Independence Advisers and Retirement Specialists. No charge for first meeting to understand how it works

Filed Under: Money

Singapore Savings Bonds SSB December 2019 Issue Yields 1.71% for 10 Year and 1.56% for 1 Year

November 5, 2019 by Kyith Leave a Comment

Here is a higher yielding, safe way to save your money that you have no idea when you will need to use it, or your emergency fund.

The December 2019’s SSB bonds yield an interest rate of 1.71%/yr for the next 10 years. You can apply through ATM or Internet Banking via the three banks (UOB,OCBC, DBS)

However, if you only hold the SSB bonds for 1 year, with 2 semi-annual payments, your interest rate is 1.56%/yr.

$10,000 will grow to $11,713 in 10 years.

This bond is backed by the Singapore Government and its available to Singaporeans.

A single person can own not more than SG$200,000 worth of Singapore Savings Bonds. You can also use your Supplementary Retirement Scheme (SRS) account to purchase.

You can find out more information about the SSB here.

December 2019 Singapore Savings Bonds Interest

Note that every month, there will be a new issue you can subscribe to via ATM. The 1 to 10 year yield you will get will differ from this month’s ladder as shown above.

Last month’s bond yields 1.74%/yr for 10 years and 1.62%/yr for 1 year.

Here is the current historical SSB 10 Year Yield Curve with the 1 Year Yield Curve since Oct 2015 when SSB was started (Click on the chart, move over the line to see the actual yield for that month):

The Application and Redemption Schedule

You will apply for the bonds through the month. At the end of the month, you will know how much of the bond you applied was successful.

Here is the schedule for application and redemption if you wish to sell:

Click to see larger schedule

You have 02 to about 25th of the month (technically the 4th day from the last working day of the month) to apply or decide to redeem the SSB that you wish to redeem.

Your bond will be in your CDP on the 1st of the next month. You will see your cash in your bank account linked to your CDP account on the 1st of next month.

How does the Singapore Savings Bonds Compare versus SGS Bonds versus Singapore Treasury Bills?

Singapore savings bonds, is like a “unit trust” or a “fund” of SGS Bonds.

But what is the difference between you buying SGS Bonds and its sister the T-Bills directly?

Both the SGS Bonds and T-Bills are also issued by the Government and are AAA rated.

Here is an MAS detailed comparison of the three:

SGS Bonds versus Singapore T-bills versus Singapore Savings Bonds
Click to see bigger comparison table

What is this Singapore Savings Bonds? Read my past write ups:

  1. This Singapore Savings Bonds: Liquidity, Higher Returns and Government Backing. Dream?
  2. More details of the Singapore Savings Bond. Looks like my Emergency Funds now
  3. Singapore Savings Bonds Max Holding Limit is $200,000 for now. Apply via DBS, OCBC, UOB ATM
  4. Singapore Savings Bonds’ Inflation Protection Abilities
  5. Some instructions how to apply for the Singapore Savings Bonds

Past Issues of SSB and their Rates:

  • 2015 Oct
  • 2015 Nov
  • 2015 Dec
  • 2016 Jan
  • 2016 Feb
  • 2016 Mar
  • 2016 Apr
  • 2016 May
  • 2016 Jun
  • 2016 Jul
  • 2016 Aug
  • 2016 Sep
  • 2016 Oct
  • 2016 Nov
  • 2016 Dec
  • 2017 Jan
  • 2017 Feb
  • 2017 Mar
  • 2017 Apr
  • 2017 May
  • 2017 Jun
  • 2017 Jul
  • 2017 Aug
  • 2017 Sep
  • 2017 Oct
  • 2017 Nov
  • 2018 Jan
  • 2018 Feb
  • 2018 Mar
  • 2018 Apr
  • 2018 May
  • 2018 Jun
  • 2018 Jul
  • 2018 Aug
  • 2018 Sep
  • 2018 Oct
  • 2018 Nov
  • 2018 Dec
  • 2019 Jan
  • 2019 Feb
  • 2019 Mar
  • 2019 Apr
  • 2019 May
  • 2019 Jun
  • 2019 Jul
  • 2019 Aug
  • 2019 Sep
  • 2019 Oct
  • 2019 Nov

Do Like Me on Facebook. I share some tidbits that is not on the blog post there often. You can also choose to subscribe to my content via email below.

I break down my resources according to these topics:

  1. Building Your Wealth Foundation – If you know and apply these simple financial concepts, your long term wealth should be pretty well managed. Find out what they are
  2. Active Investing – For the active stock investors. My deeper thoughts from my stock investing experience
  3. Learning about REITs – My Free “Course” on REIT Investing for Beginners and Seasoned Investors
  4. Dividend Stock Tracker – Track all the common 4-10% yielding dividend stocks in SG
  5. Free Stock Portfolio Tracking Google Sheets that many love
  6. Retirement Planning, Financial Independence and Spending down money – My deep dive into how much you need to achieve these, and the different ways you can be financially free
  7. Providend – Where I work doing research. Fee-Only Advisory. No Commissions. Financial Independence Advisers and Retirement Specialists. No charge for first meeting to understand how it works

Filed Under: Saving and Investing My Money

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • …
  • 597
  • Next Page »
MoneyOwl Invest

Best Articles

  • Singapore High Yield Dividend Stocks for Income
  • Free Online Stock Investment Portfolio Spreadsheet
  • 5 Steps to Compound Wealth via Dividend Income
  • My Insurance Philosophy
  • Get Rich – Pay Yourself First
  • Should you buy Blue Chips at ANY price?
  • I built my Wealth by following this Wealthy Formula
  • How much u need to reach Financial Independence?
  • My advice to those 20 year old starting their Financial Independence journey
  • Beginner’s Guide – How to Buy and Sell Stocks, Bonds, REITs and ETFs in Singapore

Money Management

  • Budget Babe of Singapore
  • Bully The Bear
  • DIY Insurance – Insurance your own way
  • Financial Horse
  • Heartland Boy
  • Invest Moolah
  • [email protected] Talk
  • My Housing Loan.SG
  • Providend – Fee-Only Retirement Adviser
  • SG Wealth Planner
  • Singapore High Yield Income Investing
  • Singaporean Stock Investor

Blogroll

  • Eat Dream Love – SG Premier Travel Food Review Blog
  • Giraffe Value
  • My 15 Hour Work Week
  • SG Invest Bloggers
  • The Finance SG

Value Investing

  • Donmihaihai
  • Investing Nook
  • Kelvin Seetoh
  • Margin of safety
  • Musicwhiz Value Investment
  • Re-ThinkWealth
  • SG Dividends
  • SG ThumbTack Investor
  • Small Cap Asia
  • The Asia Report

Copyright © 2019 · Investment Moats ·

Copyright © 2019 · Log in