I am trying to derive Birkhoff’s theorem in GR as an exercise: a spherically symmetric gravitational field is static in the vacuum area. I managed to prove that $g_{00}$ is independent of $t$ in the vacuum, and that $g_{00}*g_{11}=f(t)$.

But the next question is: Show that you can get back to a Schwarzschild metric by a certain mathematical operation. I am thinking at a coordinate change (or variable change on $r$) to absorb the $t$ dependence of $g_{11}$, but I can’t see the right one. Does someone has a tip to share?

The Birkhoff's Theorem in 3+1D is e.g. proven (at a physics level of rigor) in Ref. 1 and Ref. 2. (An elegant equivalent 1-page proof of Birkhoff's theorem is given in Refs. 3-4.) Imagine that we have managed to argue$^1$ that the metric is of the form of eq. (5.38) in Ref. 1 or eq. (7.13) in Ref. 2:

$$ds^2~=~-e^{2alpha(r,t)}dt^2 + e^{2beta(r,t)}dr^2 +r^2 dOmega^2. tag{A} $$

It is a straightforward exercise to calculate the corresponding Ricci tensor $R_{munu}$, see eq. (5.41) in Ref. 1 or eq. (7.16) in Ref. 2. The notation is here $$x^0equiv t, quad x^1equiv r, quad x^2equivtheta, quadtext{and} quad x^3equivphi.$$ The Einstein's equations in vacuum read

$$R_{munu}~=~Lambda g_{munu}~.tag{E} $$

The argument is now as follows.

From $$0~stackrel{(E)}{=}~R_{tr}~=~frac{2}{r}partial_tbeta$$ follows that $beta$ is independent of $t$.

From $$0~stackrel{(A)}{=}~Lambdaleft(e^{2(beta-alpha)} g_{tt}+g_{rr} right) ~stackrel{(E)}{=}~ e^{2(beta-alpha)} R_{tt}+R_{rr}~=~frac{2}{r}partial_r(alpha+beta) $$ follows that $partial_r(alpha+beta)=0$. In other words, the function $f(t):=alpha+beta $ is independent of $r$.

Define a new coordinate variable $T:=int^t dt'~e^{f(t')}$. Then the metric $(A)$ becomes $$ds^2~=~-e^{-2beta}dT^2 + e^{2beta}dr^2 +r^2 dOmega^2.tag{B}$$

Rename the new coordinate variable $Tto t$. Then eq. $(B)$ corresponds to setting $alpha=-beta$ in eq. $(A)$.

From $$Lambda r^2~stackrel{(B)}{=}~Lambda g_{thetatheta} ~stackrel{(E)}{=}~ R_{thetatheta} ~=~1+e^{-2beta}left(rpartial_r(beta-alpha)-1right) ~=~1-partial_r(re^{-2beta}), $$ it follows that $$ re^{-2beta}~=~r-R-frac{Lambda}{3}r^3 $$ for some real integration constant $R$. In other words, we have derived the Schwarzschild-(anti)de Sitter solution, $$e^{2alpha}~=~e^{-2beta}~=~1-frac{R}{r}-frac{Lambda}{3}r^2.$$

Finally, if we switch back to the original $t$ coordinate variable, the metric $(A)$ becomes

$$begin{align}ds^2~=~&-left(1-frac{R}{r}-frac{Lambda}{3}r^2right)e^{2f(t)}dt^2 cr &+ left(1-frac{R}{r}-frac{Lambda}{3}r^2right)^{-1}dr^2 +r^2 dOmega^2.end{align}tag{C}$$

It is interesting that the metric $(C)$ is the most general metric of the form $(A)$ that satisfies Einstein's vacuum equations. The only freedom is the function $f=f(t)$, which reflects the freedom to reparametrize the $t$ coordinate variable.

References:

Sean Carroll,

*Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity,*2003.Sean Carroll,

*Lecture Notes on General Relativity,*Chapter 7. The pdf file is available here.Eric Poisson,

*A Relativist's Toolkit,*2004; Section 5.1.1.Eric Poisson,

*An Advanced course in GR*; Section 5.1.1.

--

$^1$ Here we for convenience show how Ref. 1 and Ref. 2 reduce from

$$begin{align} ds^2~=~&g_{aa}(a,r)~da^2 +2g_{ar}(a,r)~ da~dr cr &+g_{rr}(a,r)~ dr^2 +r^2dOmega^2end{align} tag{5.30/7.5}$$
to
$$ ds^2~=~m(r,t)~dt^2 +n(r,t)~dr^2 +r^2dOmega^2. tag{5.37/7.12}$$
*Proof:* Define a function
$$n~:=~g_{rr}-frac{g_{ar}^2}{g_{aa}}$$
and an inexact differential
$$ omega~:=~da+frac{g_{ar}}{g_{aa}}dr.$$
Then eq. (5.30/7.5) reads
$$ ds^2~=~g_{aa}omega^2 +n~dr^2 +r^2dOmega^2.$$
The function $sqrt{m}$ in eq. (5.37/7.12) can be viewed as an integrating factor to make the differential $sqrt{frac{g_{aa}}{m}}omega$ exact, i.e. of the form $dt$ for some function $t(a,r)$.

Answered by Qmechanic on November 21, 2021

Are you doing this rigorously by using an ansatz for your metric and plugging it into the usual Einstein field equations in vacuum or something "more topological"?

If former, in the most common ansatz,

$ds^2 = e^{f(t,r)} dt^2 - e^{g(t,r)} dr^2 - r^2 dOmega^2 $

you get your metric independence of time t with the

{01}th Ricci tensor component, which sets a time derivative of one of your metric components to 0. Algebraic combinations of the other Ricci tensor componentes give you the relationships between metric component functions $f$ and $g$, somewhere along the way you should get something like $frac{d}{dt}[f(t,r)-g(t,r)] = 0$. That gives you your time independance of $g_{11}$.

Answered by Thomas M. on November 21, 2021

0 Asked on February 18, 2021 by mr-mxyzptlk

electromagnetism magnetic fields magnetic monopoles potential topology

1 Asked on February 18, 2021 by federico-mastellone

magnetic moment neutrons nuclear physics protons quantum mechanics

0 Asked on February 17, 2021

measurements photoelectric effect photons quantum electrodynamics quantum optics

0 Asked on February 17, 2021 by botsina

1 Asked on February 17, 2021 by michkov

2 Asked on February 17, 2021

calculus classical mechanics coordinate systems differentiation

1 Asked on February 17, 2021

2 Asked on February 17, 2021

born rule classical mechanics hilbert space quantum mechanics

1 Asked on February 17, 2021

1 Asked on February 17, 2021 by chandan-gupta

frequency harmonic oscillator superposition vibrations waves

2 Asked on February 17, 2021 by cattosphere

capillary action classical mechanics energy conservation potential energy

0 Asked on February 17, 2021

binding energy mass energy nuclear engineering nuclear physics

0 Asked on February 17, 2021 by conraddell

1 Asked on February 17, 2021 by pooja

bose einstein condensate resource recommendations statistical mechanics symmetry breaking

1 Asked on February 17, 2021 by code-complete

1 Asked on February 17, 2021 by lordnoob

1 Asked on February 17, 2021 by zguy1217

1 Asked on February 17, 2021 by jalede-jaled

1 Asked on February 17, 2021 by snpr_physics

Get help from others!

Recent Answers

- GBG on Deleting values less than 0.31 in NDVI raster layer in QGIS
- PDash on Interactively Display Values of a Heatmap.js leaflet.js Heatmap Layer
- BERA on Deleting values less than 0.31 in NDVI raster layer in QGIS
- Kazuhito on Multiplying rasters by integers in processing modeler
- ThomasG77 on Joining attributes by location for multiple layers using PyQGIS

© 2021 InsideDarkWeb.com. All rights reserved.